Who Would YOU Trust More with National Security Information?

Apparently, a four-legged fur beast was deemed more intelligent, competent, and trustworthy to be involved in the raid that ultimately brought down ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi than the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Of course, no one could expect House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to be physically involved with such a mission — that’s not the job of any lawmaker, and thank God that it isn’t. But, deploying Pelosi on the battlefield would likely do less to ensure the mission’s failure than simply telling her about it would be. That’s because Pelosi isn’t actually in charge of the Democratic Party — or even Congress, as her title implies. Pelosi is a servant to the whims of the Democratic Party’s radical base. Without these people, Pelosi has no career, and she knows it.

Democrats and the media — but we repeat ourselves — are very upset with the Trump Administration for leaving liberal leaders in the dark during the run-up to the operation to slay the ISIS leader. If they want to be more involved, perhaps Pelosi should stop letting Rep. Adam Schiff leak valuable information to the press every five minutes to score brownie points with the liberal media.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More