Reality: You Can’t Ban Guns OR Journalists

Weeks ago, CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta get into a heated exchange with President Trump and refused to give up his microphone. After he appeared to shove off a young intern attempting to recover the microphone, the White House suspended his press pass. Liberals were outraged.

This was reported as an attack on the First Amendment, and a federal judge agreed. Apparently, Jim Acosta’s First Amendment freedoms were threatened by him no longer having special access to President Trump. We were told that banning one journalist is a threat to free speech. Now, wouldn’t it be great if liberals applied this same logic to the rest of the Constitution? That’s what Kaitlin Bennet is asking for in this tweet.

The fact is that the left has been calling for bans on certain firearms all year. While some are just focused on scary looking tactical weapons like the AR-15, others have suggested that all semi-automatic weapons should be removed from civilian hands. This covers the vast majority of legal firearms in circulation. It’s hard not to see that as an attack on the Second Amendment.

So, which is more important: Jim Acosta’s special press privileges, or one of the most fundamental rights we have as Americans? Mull that over for as long as you need to.

~ Facts Not Memes


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More