How Does One Support Background Checks, but Oppose Borders?

Recently, a satirical Twitter account mocking Speaker of the House Paul Ryan tweeted out what was likely expected to be a slam-dunk, but turned out to be a gaping hole of hypocrisy.

In the text, Ryan is shown making the argument against terrorists having guns, but refusing to implement some sort of federal background check to make sure that this doesn’t happen.

This begs the question…how would liberals respond if the wording was a bit different?

Let’s try this out right now, using the progressive left’s favorite politician as a hypothetical.

Bernie Sanders: “We need to make sure our country is safe from terrorism.”

Do you support background checks for migrants entering the country?

Bernie Sanders: “No.”

See? The whole argument falls on its face within seconds.

Predictably, a liberal might respond by saying that the issue of gun control and terrorism are unrelated. But if that’s true, what’s the danger with allowing Americans to purchase firearms with absolutely no government oversight? Does this make the terror threat larger or smaller?

Of course, conservatives understand that only the good guys bother to follow the actual laws, so this doesn’t really matter that much. But in the liberal mind, everything revolves around government authority — except immigration, apparently.

~ Facts Not Memes

Most Popular

These content links are provided by Both and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More