Who posses more of an existential threat to the United States and the West at large: a radical terror leader with a truly medieval ideology, or a smirking high schooler in a MAGA hat?
Based on what the mainstream media reports on these people, you would think that Nick Sandmann — who is suing several media outlets for their blatant defamation, was the one rounding up Muslim men, women, and children by the thousands, and having them beheaded for heresy. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, by contrast, was just an “austere religious scholar” with a bit of a “conservative” bend. That’s right, they actually used that word to describe his beliefs…
The media’s agenda here has never before been more painfully obvious. A teenager espousing the same beliefs as roughly half of the country is a shining symbol of evil and hatred, while an Islamic terrorist is just misunderstood. Don’t expect the Washington Post to issue any corrections either, because that’s never going to happen.
Don’t ever forget how the media treats people, or how stories are framed.